Wednesday 16th July 2025
Blog Page 560

Review: I Was Meant to Love – Leon C

0

If you’ve been looking for new music, I’d highly recommend Leon C. Describing himself as a ‘contemporary folk singer songwriter’, he’s released a string of singles and an album Please (2018), showing continual progression and improvement. Citing influences from Bob Dylan to The Lumineers, his gentle guitar melodies blend with a genuinely beautiful voice to create the kind of music you want to listen to in bed at 2am when everything outside is dark and quiet. Considering he’s only nineteen and already creating sophisticated and genuinely good music, I predict his fan base to grow massively in the next few years.

This music has culminated in his most recent release. I Was Meant to Love was released on 2ndNovember, and I must have listened to it at least thirty times just on the first day I heard it. The gentle melancholy of the song is both soothing and haunting, reminiscent of Charlie Fink, Will Varley, or dare I say it earlier acoustic Frank Turner. It’s far more elegant than much of the folk I’ve heard, and you could imagine the lyrics written in a poetry book: ‘in my mind she has no strength/she just gives up on the present tense/when all you do is sing and shout/like a cigarette it just burns out’. The instruments too are simple but effective, a rhythmic guitar refrain running throughout, with piano and percussion building towards the end of the song. Over a decade of classical training has paid off as Leon clearly understand exactly how to blend the different sounds together, along with a spectacular vocal line, to create a gentle but full piece of music.

My only complaint is that the song feels a little too long: at 5.18 it pushes at the limits of how far a reasonably simple refrain can stay as captivating as it is at the start. The song follows an elegant, but fairly predictable chord progression, although the candid beauty of the lyrics prevents it from becoming dull. The slightly unexpected build a minute from the end is a welcome variation, and could possibly have come a little earlier. That being said, it’s pretty much the only complaint I have about a pretty wonderful piece of art.

Altogether, it’s remarkable that Leon C is not a household name already. As well as having a genuinely beautiful voice, he has clear music talent, and I’m excited to see where it will take him in the future. Currently based in Birmingham, he plays frequent shows around the area, as well as around Winchester and Southampton, where he originally comes from, and I’d encourage you to try to make one. And if you have a few free minutes today  listen to I Was Meant to Love. I promise you won’t regret it.

Review: Spector at The Bullingdon

0

9pm, The Bullingdon, a Tuesday evening. Those three ingredients are pretty much guaranteed either to produce an awful or a brilliant night. Thankfully for everyone crammed into the main room to experience indie-rock band Spector, the night of 12thNovember was very much the latter. 

The music itself was predictably fantastic. With two albums and a handful of EPs, it was easy for the crowd to sing along to every song that the London four-piece played. As well as the major hits, the band effortlessly slipped into the more recent Simplicity and Half Life, joking that they’d been out for a few months, so we all had enough time to learn the words. The band are seasoned and excellent performers, and in the couple of days since the gig I’ve been listening to them on repeat, despite only knowing a handful properly before. Combining a classic indie rock vibe with wry, candid lyrics leads to a collection of songs which are both highly relatable and guaranteed to make you want to dance along.

From my experiences, gigs in Oxford can be a mixed bunch when it comes to the atmosphere of the crowd, but the vast majority of those in Bully that night were happy to get involved and jump along enthusiastically to every drum beat. The mosh pit for All the Sad Young Men kicked off to such an extent that I couldn’t help but jump straight into the middle of it, despite being both sleep deprived and injured. Although my back is aching this morning and I missed a night at Freud, I have to say that I had such a good time that my regrets are non-existent. Although the edges of the crowd didn’t get too involved, in the center of the room the atmosphere was electric, filled with dancing people and the occasional thrown pint. Overall, one of the best crowds I’ve seen at a local gig.

Despite their brilliant performance though, the standout element of the gig for once wasn’t the music. I’ve been to a lot of gigs, but I’ve never seen a front-man with such an easy and charming stage presence as Fred Macpherson. Even on 23rdnight of a 24 night tour his vocals didn’t slip, and he mixed chatting with the crowd with effortlessly belting out hits like Chevy Thunder, and Friday Night, Don’t Ever Let it End. Jumping into the crowd to dance, taking videos on the phones of recording fans, and handing out tequila shots from his seat someone’s shoulders were just some of the ways in which Macpherson made sure the crowd were all having a brilliant time, even when the songs weren’t playing. Effortlessly likable and incredibly talented, he made what would have already been a great gig and excellent one.

Overall then, if you get a chance to go and see Spector live, even if you haven’t heard much of their stuff before, I would massively recommend it. Friends who went to gigs in other locations have echoed my sentiments, and it would be hard to be disappointed by such an excellent performance. Possibly the best gig I’ve seen in Oxford – my only complaint is that I can’t go and relive it all over again. 

Review: MAGDALENE – FKA Twigs

0

Five years since her first album, FKA twigs is back with MAGDALENE, a unique emotional exploration of heartbreak, depression, and modern femininity. To tackle these potentially played out themes, however, twigs combines her ultra-modern glitchy electronic production and incredibly versatile voice with inspiration from two thousand years ago: Mary Magdalene, one of Christ’s closest followers who has been viewed through history as a sinful prostitute and whose story has only recently been reclaimed. Twigs uses Magdalene as a representation of positive femininity, and of the patriarchal narratives that have been imposed on her own art and life. 

The record begins with ‘thousand eyes’, which sounds like an impressive vocal warm-up or Gregorian chant, in which twigs expresses fear over leaving a relationship and the public scrutiny she faces: ‘If you don’t pull me back it wakes a thousand eyes.’ This is reminiscent of the first song, ‘Preface’, from her debut album LP1 all those years ago, which opens with similar choral layering and themes of insecurity and failing romance. But this first song is where the comparisons between the two records start and end: while no-one would call her first album tame or guarded, with MAGDALENE twigs forges new ground by expanding her instrumental range, and more importantly by fully exposing her vulnerabilities and finding astonishing strength in expressing them. 

I was lucky enough to see twigs moved to tears at a concert in May: alone on stage, dressed in colourful Renaissance fabrics, crying intensely while singing some of the new songs from MAGDALENE. Twigs said (in an interview with Beats 1’s Zane Lowe) that for her, “the saddest part of the album is the bridge on ‘sad day’”, an atmospheric song about the risks and foolishness inherent in love. A music video is in the works, but for now ‘sad day’ has been released with the image of twigs half obscured in a doorway, possibly in the act of backing out of a relationship but unable to take her eyes off what she’s leaving behind. I tend to be even more moved by ‘mirrored heart’, in which twigs laments over sparse and sometimes softly discordant production, that successful couples who find symmetry and reciprocation ‘just remind me I’m without you.’ After this tragic tone the album moves straight onto ‘daybed’, in which twigs describes her experience of depression through a series of poetic juxtapositions: ‘Vacant are my nightmares/rest becomes my nowhere.’ None of the album’s song titles are capitalised, incidentally – in keeping with the intimacy in the tone and lyrics of all the songs.

Despite the pain and sorrow present on the album, twigs manages to convey great strength and resilience. At times on the album strength is created sonically: for example through the shouted verses and crowded, frantic production of ‘fallen alien’, an aggressive message to a lying lover. Sometimes, however, this strength is manifested physically: for the music videos and tour performances accompanying MAGDALENE, twigs trained like an athlete and learnt brilliant, gravity-defying pole-dancing tricks along with the graceful art of wushu sword-fighting. Her dancing and training routine was hardly affected last year, when she unfortunately had to undergo invasive surgery for fibroid tumours. Although this struggle played a large part in the background of the record, twigs expresses her own resilience with humility. It is only addressed obliquely in the slow staccato recitation, almost rap-like, of the intro to ‘home with you’: “Apples, cherries, pain/ breathe in, breathe out, pain/ no, no novocaine/ still maintain my grace”. (Apples and cherries refer to the size of the tumours, which created, as twigs wrote in an Instagram post detailing the surgery, ‘a fruit bowl of pain’.)

The strongest sense of the album’s overall message is found on the titular ‘mary magdalene’. Here twigs puts forward her feminist vision for a woman’s role: ‘A woman’s prerogative/ A woman’s time to embrace, she must put herself first.’ This is supported by the image of Mary Magdalene, in whose story twigs finds ‘a lot of dignity, a lot of grace, a lot of inspiration’ (words from an interview with i-D magazine). She fights against subservience, and asserts Mary Magdalene’s role not as an object of, but herself a ‘creature of desire’. But twigs’ vision of female empowerment isn’t completely clear-cut, and leaves room for a lot of nuance, of course. One of the ongoing gender roles twigs finds fault with is the expectation for women to be nurturing and caring: she tells Zane Lowe, ‘maybe that is unfortunately still part of being a woman, that free emotional labour that we put into all of our relationships.’ But in ‘home with you’, she manages to find incredible beauty in this role; she is depicted all in white in a gorgeous music video running through fields to the words, ‘I didn’t know that you were lonely/ If you’d have just told me I’d be home with you.’ 

Any questions about the role of men in the world twigs has created are answered by ‘holy terrain’, the most accessible song on the album, with its trap-inspired beat and Future feature (and two huge producers, Skrillex and Jack Antonoff also enlisted). Probably the least interesting song on the record sonically, it seems a little out of place among the emotion and experimental approach of the rest of the songs. But it does serve as an enjoyable break from the album’s intensity, and is still pretty lyrically dense. Twigs explains that she’s looking for ‘a man who can follow his heart/ not get bound by his boys and his chains.’ And, lucky enough to score not just the album’s only feature, but twigs’ first ever, this isn’t just the Future of a few years back rapping incoherently in a druggy haze; this is the melancholic, self-aware Future of this year’s ‘SAVE ME’. He sounds genuinely apologetic rapping lines like ‘I feed you poison forever my lady’ and ‘Pray for my sins, make me stronger where I’m weak.’ 

When all is said and done, I think my favourite song on the record will always be ‘cellophane’, the first single back after a long break, now given new meaning as the album’s closer. The song proves that, despite her unquestionable strength as a producer, twigs’ voice can carry a track perfectly with as little backing as possible – mostly just piano chords. And while it served as a gorgeous introduction to this new phase of twigs’ music when it was released in April, now its lyrics sum up the emotions and insecurities of the whole album, and of her past relationship(s?). She conveys the way a breakup can confuse time by meshing together different tenses in the central, tragically unanswered, questions: ‘Didn’t I do it for you? Why don’t I do it for you? Why won’t you do it for me, when all I do is for you?’ And she finishes the record the way she started it, in fear of the invasive public scrutiny she faces: ‘They’re watching us, they’re hating.’ Perhaps the song’s repeated questions are partially directed at her audience, and the unattainable expectations and judgement imposed on her? On the bright side, the album’s vulnerability is one of its greatest strengths, and it is clear that the sadness which permeates through it is met with twigs’ impressive defiance and resilience. The album is successful, personal, and unique, and represents twigs’ growth as an artist (and in general). In my opinion, one of FKA twigs’ most poetic lines isn’t actually a lyric, but a throwaway comment in her interview with Zane Lowe: to her, MAGDALENE is about ‘finding my voice without society’s whispers’.

Review: The Treasures of Recycled Sculpture

0

I was caught in heavy Saturday rain on my way to the exhibition. The beating showers and bone-chilling winds had me thinking about today’s forecasts, of descent into ecological crisis, of dramatic rises in temperature and apocalyptic weather on a global scale. It is hard not to feel disheartened in today’s world, where one is perpetually bombarded with predictions of the end and the disheartening, blatant hypocrisy from the corporate powers-that-be. Such ideas were on my mind as I entered the exhibition, and as I left it, I found that my mental load had lightened. The exhibition left me feeling a little more hopeful about a future where sustainability would be seen on a wider scale.

At a first glance, Reinvention ‘The Treasures of Recycled Sculpture’ was a breath of fresh air from the chaos of fast-fashion, pollution and upheaval. It demonstrated the possibilities of recycling and sustainability in the production of works of art in a creative community which I feel has at times lacked foresight into the waste that it has the potential of producing whilst making evocative pieces. All of the sculptures had within them the rebirth of materials and objects once used and, rather than thrown, given new life. The garden was blanketed with autumn leaves and, if not for the presence of the building behind me and the rooftops peaking over the exhibition walls, I’d have imagined myself in the Secret Garden. The sculptures were hidden in the undergrowth and made themselves at home with the orange shrubbery; it made for an entertaining show, where an amalgam of eldritch creatures would push for you whilst others blended in with the bark and bushes.

To my dismay, some of the works of art that had been put up for sale had already been rehomed (I wish I could have seen them all!) but those I was lucky enough to see made my venture into the British downpour a worthwhile one. The display featured the work of a number of artists such as Barnaby Lea, Matt Smart and Sophie Thompson, and the exhibition list that I picked up on my way out informed me of the fact their works were smattered about rather than grouped together. This proved to be a unique viewing experience. You found yourself with multiple works at the same time, the small garden space dividing itself into smaller viewing rooms.

In the first instance, Thompson’s Small Fish and Big Fish swam above my head between the branches of the tree nearest to the entrance; at the same time, the felled tree of Smart’s Stumped had me watching my step. The former, made of repurposed steel, had a beautifully aged and crafted quality to them and seemed at home with their environment whilst the tree, of pale fibreglass and fabric, grew from below like a ghost. The irony of the experience – of fish flying and trees displaced in the forest – was not lost upon me and I found myself strongly amused by the situation. Goose used the shape of an old pair of shears for its head, making me think of modernist re-appropriation of imagery. Poppy Heads grew out of the bush like metal flowers from a copper bush. At the back of the garden Meditation (Smart’s cotton, resin, fibreglass, galvanised steel and latex) sat with palms skyward in prayer, whilst across from it the terrifying pale Angel emerged from the ivy, elaborate horns of wood and resin twisting against bottle-green leaves. Unlike the first scene, this was fascinating and eldritch, and I could not help but notice the shrine-like Buffalo placed at a distance between them, forming a strange triad of mystery and worship.

Outdoor exhibitions are exposed to the elements, and I bore first-hand witness of this when viewing Larisa’s Deep Water. The mixed medium piece was a provocative imagining of people on ships, travelling towards uncertainty. Miniature figures in recycled boats reminded me of issues surrounding immigration today, especially as on of the boats were overturned, the people spilling into the blue tarpaulin ocean that had filled with rainwater. My biggest issue with the exhibition had to do with the upkeep of some of its exhibitions. Understandably, autumn brings with it the fall (pun intended) of leaves and the wetter weather, but you would expect there to be more cleanliness surrounding the presentation of works – compared to a Frieze exhibition that I saw a few years ago in London, I feel that some of the works were at risk of being obscured. In fact, with regards to Deep Water, I felt that much of the piece was hidden to me…

Other than this discrepancy, I felt the
exhibition to be a wonderful balance of the artificial and the natural. As Greta said back in September, “the world is waking up,” and an eco-spirit has now begun to possess people with the desire for better change during our time of increasing environmental tragedy. Changes on a macro-scale – such as faces of Youtube community’s endeavour to plant millions of trees – are slithers of hope through the noise of online hysteria, and I believe that it can be of disservice when one dwells too much on how small one might feel in the face of it. This is what I found to be so inspiring in Reinvention: small changes, when in their multitude, produce larger change.

Image: example of recycled art CREDIT She Paused 4 Thought, Recycled art around santiago

Review: Uncomfortable Oxford Tour

0

The tour began at the Carfax tower with tales of the town-gown divide in the early days of Oxford University. A third year undergraduate led the group of students and tourists around the town centre. The programme was refreshing in emphasising that the uncomfortable history of Oxford isn’t all history; standing on the busy Saturday High Street looking up at Cecil Rhodes, with church bells blasting in the pouring rain, I felt the juxtaposition of past and present immediately. At times the tour’s nuance gave way to the pursuit of righteousness. The group was asked to voice opinions, and I couldn’t help but notice a mood of willing outrage. The tourists’ lack of familiarity with the uni allowed for wild interpretations of some of the points made; the Oxford Union was dubbed ‘basically a private member’s club’, the admissions system suspected of ‘testing for more than academic potential’. Discussion of accountability of colleges for links to slavery prompted criticisms which illuminated why, once at fault, ‘doing the right thing’ for reparation or repentance is impossible. Among the points made by the group was how ceasing to commemorate a ‘problematic’ figure is historical sterilisation, while continuing to celebrate such figures is blatant injustice. It’s a catch-22. Uncomfortable Oxford brings together more than enough polemics and controversy, tingeing familiar places with disheartening stories. A healthy level of scepticism to the tales as presented, and to the judgments of the crowd, is required.

Ancient statues reveal their true colours

0

Imagine for a moment that you’re standing in Ancient Greece. Theatres, temples, and statues, which survive to us only as ruins, stand intact all around you, white marble gleaming in the Mediterranean sun.

Now, get rid of that mental image entirely – crumple it up and throw it in the trash. Contrary to popular assumption, Greek and Roman marbles were almost exclusively painted, usually in bright and contrasting colours which rendered the sculpture more conspicuous at a distance. The pervasive image of Greek marble sculpture as pure, austere, blank, and imposing has been exploited for its iconic status by a number of people from Adolf Hitler, appropriating Myron’s discus thrower as the epitome of the ideal male, to Kanye West, appealing to the emotive nature of Late Classical Greek sculpture in his music video for “No Church in the Wild”. It takes a considerable amount of mental readjustment to imagine the vibrancy of colour that would have been present, for example, on freestanding sculpture, grave reliefs, and temple decorations.

The Greek playwright Euripides tells of Helen of Troy, the most beautiful woman on earth, who expresses her wish to be ugly as a desire to be like a sculpture from which the paint has been rubbed off. This is how most classic sculpture survives to us now, and thus it should come as no surprise that the exact opposite view was cultivated by collectors of ancient sculpture: blank marble is ‘pure’, whereas painted marble looks trashy. ‘The antiquities of Athens and other monuments of Greece’, first published in 1762, but reprinted in several editions throughout the 19th century, gives a delightfully dated description of painted marble, expressing great dismay at the “vile practice” of using “glaring colours” to create “violent contrasts”, which “gives a strange contradiction to our cherished notions concerning the purity of Grecian taste.”

Indeed, our surviving collections of Greek and Roman sculpture have often suffered from this perceived “purity of Grecian taste” as dated restoration practices involved the use of harsh chemicals and abrasives to remove any traces of paint from the marble.

A great scandal arose around the methods of restoration used on the Parthenon marbles at the British Museum in the 1930s, which allegedly removed not only dirt but original paint in an effort to make the marble perfectly white. Nowadays, it is well known that ancient marble was painted and this sort of intentional damage is much lamented. Ironically, however, most people who haven’t studied art or classics have no reason to know any of this, inadvertently perpetuating extremely dated views. The notion that Classical Greek art is some sort of aesthetic paradigm, characterised by the use of ‘pure’ marble as a medium, lingers in the popular consciousness despite no longer being a view subscribed to explicitly by scholars. How does one change the common perception, especially when it no longer survives in its original form? While popular culture has a great influence on our perception of ancient cultures (compare for example the appropriation of Norse gods by the Marvel franchise), museums also determine the way in which we view a piece of art by determining the context in which it is displayed.

The Ashmolean is one example of how museums are increasingly including reconstructions of painted marble in their displays; you can go see a painted reconstruction of the ‘Prima Porta’ statue of the emperor Augustus in the Ashmolean’s cast gallery.

Union President withdraws charge of violent misconduct against Ebenezer Azamati

0

Brendan McGrath has withdrawn his charge of violent misconduct against Ebenezer Azamati, who was expelled from the Union chamber during a debate last month.

McGrath apologized “unreservedly for the distress and any reputational damage which the publication of the charge may have caused him”.

In a statement, the Oxford University Africa Society, who organised a protest against the Union’s treatment of Azamati on Friday, said: “The Oxford Union Africa Society expresses its profound gratitude to everyone in Oxford and beyond, who has expressed solidarity – including through the Friday evening protest action – to expose the Union’s injustice and do the right thing. Together, we did it! Mr Azamati is also deeply grateful for the immense outpouring of love and support from within Oxford and all over the world.

“While we are pleased with this development, we would like to reiterate that this issue is not settled as our demands are yet to be fully met. These include:

  • A public apology from the Oxford Union and its President, Brendan McGrath
  • An official confirmation that Mr Azamati’s Union membership has been reinstated
  • A public announcement by the Oxford Union on the apporpriate disciplinary process and punishment to be meted out to its staff, the security guard, who assaulted Mr Azamati
  • Details on how the Oxford Union intends to compensate Mr Azamati.”

The statement also repeated calls for the resignation of Brendan McGrath.

Review: Hamlet

0

“Would you not see a hundred Hamlets pottering about Broad Street?” Evelyn Waugh’s question is pertinent today: of course Oxford’s the best place to put on Hamlet, since where, outside Elsinore and Wittenberg, will you find so many self-questioning, introspective and pretty pretentious students in close proximity? It’s surprising then that Cosmic Arts’ new production at the Keble O’Reilly Theatre is Oxford’s first big one for several years. Maybe it’s because contest over theatre’s best lead role is so fierce: apparently over 100 auditioned to play the Dane. Still, director Agnes Pethers and her team have overcome this internecine thespian conflict to produce a production of startling relevance: “it could have been written two weeks ago”, she told me. I agree. I also think that it’s startlingly good. 

Hamlet’s a hard to put on. We’ve all seen, studied or spoofed it at some point. To many it’s a collection of quotes: “to be or not to be”, the bit with the skull and that line about dust. The themes and nuances of the text get lost with a myopic obsession of who’s playing the lead. Cosmic Arts’ production changes all that. This a text-driven production and with good reason. Agnes’ choice to put the play on now was driven by her conviction that its themes are essential for our time, where student mental health is, tragically, such a pressing issue. As she told me, we focus so much on “to be or not to be” being a canny example of iambic pentameter that we forget it’s the heart-broken lament of a lonely young man on the edge of suicide. Mental health and how we respond to it are at the core of this production; a perfect winning of good cause and a play which asks all the important questions about life, sadness and suicide but gives no easy answers. Half its profits are going to the brilliant charity CALM. That would be reason enough to go see it. It helps that it’s also very well done. 

Jack Parkin’s Hamlet is extraordinary. I found his “to be or not to be” deeply affecting, as his quietness and under-statement perfectly brings out the sadness in the Prince’s position. His fellow residents at Elsinore more than match his performance. Cecily Brem makes a particularly impressive Ophelia: her conflict with Hamlet in the nunnery scene was beautifully realistic, the two characters flitting between emotions in a sort of Shakespearean tango. The direction and staging also make some wonderfully inventive decisions. The choice to use a filmed insert for the play-within-a-play was particularly canny, though it did appear to have been filmed on a particularly windy seaside holiday. All in all, I found it very impressive. 

So, I can wholeheartedly recommend a trip down to the Keble O’Reilly this week. This is a professional, entertaining and powerful production of the best thing written in English (sorry, Twilight). Most importantly it’s a production with a worthwhile mission. I first fell in love with Hamlet after reading it following my own teenage nervous breakdown; this clinical depressive saw, in Coleridge’s phrase, a smack of Hamlet in myself. I wholeheartedly endorse Agnes and her team’s personal commitments to using this production to highlight student mental health, to reaffirm the play as the story of a young man going through the sort of despair that unfortunately too many of us face, and showing the power of theatre to give hope to those feeling hopeless. I can’t recommend this highly enough. 

Debate: This House Believes Oxford is for Students, Not Tourists

0

Proposition: Tourists portray the wrong side of Oxford

Jamie Slagel

Little figurines of the Rad Cam; vaguely Harry Potter-themed shop-fronts; ridiculous queues to enter Christ Church: these are all the strange consequences of a quite frankly bizarre relationship tourists have with Oxford. The almost reverential treatment tourists give to Oxford may initially be nice—even exciting; but after spending over a year in Oxford, I’ve started to see a darker side to this obsession.

Like most people, when I first arrived I was in awe of Oxford: the spires, the ancient walls, the unique traditions—more than anything, the grandeur everywhere you turn. Tutes in rooms filled with extremely precious paintings; eating on tables worth more than I could imagine. I guess I sort of hero-worshipped it, and there was a constant little voice in my head thinking “Wow, I get to study and live here”. The fact that there were tourists everywhere queuing and paying to see where I lived and worked was a bit of a thrill—nothing gets you through Prelims like skipping the giant queue to the Old Bod as you flash your bod-card around triumphantly.

But quite frankly, if you think about it, it’s actually a bit weird. In fact, it’s more than weird—it’s damaging. And the way in which we cater to it as a town and as a university only makes it worse. No, I’m not going to pompously moan about how annoying all the tourists are—they have as much right to be in a public town as I do, frankly. And since the university lets them see where we eat, sleep and (sometimes) work, they have a right to be there too, I suppose. Nor does it really faze me.

But by catering to tourists, we let Oxford be defined by people who don’t actually live in, study at or go to Oxford. And this is a bad thing for us and for them. It enforces a perverse assumption that somehow we’re different to the tourists and it entrenches a mythical image of Oxford as a town still stuck hundreds of years in the past. This gives rise to a strange sense of superiority and arrogance which shimmers over Oxford—we’re all ‘woke’ enough to know that it’s not acceptable to think we are superior (and most of us probably don’t), but there’s a sense in which, in creating endless gift shops and lining tourists up outside our colleges, we’re being condescending. “Come on now, buy some of our trinkets and line up to pay to see us”.

I don’t deny that there’s great external demand to see Oxford. But the way we cater to the tourists creates a vicious circle. By commercialising Oxford—charging extortionate fees for the distinctly average experience of punting and then thrusting postcards and snow globes down their throats—we normalise this obsession. And in doing this, we harm all those in Oxford and those without. The image of Oxford is perpetrated by the media, by schools and by people who know nothing more of Oxford other than that it’s a stuffy place for the frail pale male. It’s no wonder we have a terrible access problem, because we’ve allowed a mythical image of Oxford to persist—one which is completely false. And the access problem harms us as much as them. We’re not diverse enough, and we all know it. Oxford’s moved on, and it’s a very different place to the place tourists seem to be clamouring to see.

By catering to tourists, we encourage them to consider themselves as different and at the same time to wrongly define Oxford as a microcosm of ye olde world. In doing so, our access problem becomes a self-fulfilling one and we encourage Oxford to be defined as a rich home of the intelligentsia.

And catering to tourists also ruins the whole appeal of Oxford. Not only do we allow them to define us in ways we’re not, but we start to change who we are to fit them. Sure, we don’t need to shun them, or ban them, but we don’t need to cater to them either. In catering to them we lose all the magic and eccentricity that drew both us and them to Oxford in the first place. Oxford’s so fantastic because of the people, the ideas and its achievements—so we shouldn’t let money override this, replacing Oxford as we know it with consumerism and reverential admiration-cum-obsession.

Opposition: Tourists Remind Us Just How Lucky We Are

Amelia Wood

There’s no denying that Oxford is full of tourists, and they can be a real nuisance. We’ve all had to push through throngs of them taking selfies with the Bridge of Sighs or dithering in the middle of a pavement. As a student of Balliol College, which is almost always open to tourists, I’ve heard stories of them wandering into the library and peering into students’ rooms.

So why do I think we should let them in despite all this?

Firstly, it’s a bit hypocritical of us to look down on tourists. I don’t believe for a second that there is a member of this university who hasn’t been as clueless in their own travels, be it getting the same cheesy photo at the leaning tower of Pisa or not knowing where to stand in the London Underground. Part of travelling and experiencing the world is that you won’t always know where to go and what to do, but this never stops us travelling. Just because now we’re the ones who are affected negatively, should we begrudge other tourists for what we are also guilty of?

It can be quite a weird sensation to realise that tourists don’t only come here to see Oxford’s beautiful and historic architecture. As much as any building, they come to see us. We are students of the best university in the world and on some level that makes us oddities. I experience this curiosity first-hand whenever I have to tell someone that I am an Oxford student. I feel a tiny bit of dread when I can see their minds filling with more and more questions as they attempt to put me into a category of what they associate with Oxford: am I some troubled genius or an entitled rich kid or a Boris Johnson in the making?

More than any other place, there is a lot of baggage associated with Oxford. It is often discussed how we can demystify this place and encourage a more diverse range of people to apply. Is there any better way to do that than to let people have a look rather than appearing even more exclusive and unwelcoming? Hopefully, people who look round will conclude that we are more normal than the media can make it seem. And if we are not, maybe we are worth gawking at!

I can honestly say that I quite enjoy tourists. I’m sure this wouldn’t be the case for every college – I can see why tourists are much more of a nuisance at smaller colleges and so shouldn’t be allowed in. But the colleges that are able to accommodate tourists, should. Not only for the welcome additional income stream but because I believe tourism serves a benefit that is more commonly overlooked. Tourists remind us what a true privilege it is to be able to live and study here. People travel halfway across the world to stare at what we barely give a second glance, not to mention the world-class facilities and academics that we get to work with every day. I don’t think the value of a reality check should be ever disregarded.

A Forgotten Lesson – The 30th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall

0

The legacy of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 has been largely forgotten in the current political and cultural imagination. The rose-tinted glasses of the 21st century hide the frightening reality that a mere 30 years ago, in the lifetime of our parents, Europe was one of the most bitterly divided continents on the planet. Nuclear warheads were pointed at the UK in preparation for the very real possibility of war breaking out, and most UK residents would have been aware of the location of their nearest nuclear bunker. The conflict embodied the ruthless fight between the West and East, capitalism and communism, democracy and dictatorship, that defined the war-torn 20th century. Nowhere was this division more visible than in Berlin. The wall split the city in two, ripped families apart and divided a continent. In 1989, the wall was torn down by the people of Berlin. The West has largely forgotten the significance of this world-changing event.

The battle between East and West, between totalitarianism and freedom, was integral to democracy’s self-identification in the 20th century. At the high point of communist regimes in the 20th century, over two-thirds of the world’s population were ruled by dictatorial governments. Democracy was not regarded as being permanent or inevitable as it is today. Indeed, the existence of the Iron Curtain solidified the democratic powers’ sense of fragility. This extremely novel concept, only escaping the USA, UK and France in the late 19th and early 20th centuries could collapse at any time under pressure from the USSR. Indeed, the existence of a near-state of the crisis was a huge force for unity in the West.

In the 21st Century, the pressing reality of the totalitarian experience for many appears to have lost its meaning in the face of more relevant fights like terrorism and climate change. The unspoken consensus that ‘it can’t happen here’ was defined by Francis Fukuyama’s famous book, The End of History and The Last Man. Fukuyama’s famous work claimed that the Collapse of Communism in 1989 represented the last major ideological development in world history and pronounced the ascendancy of the capitalist-democratic world order. This was a deeply arrogant perspective. The idea that democracy is somehow irreplaceable and unmovable is dangerous. A recent German study found that the number of people living under a dictatorship has risen by 1 billion in the past 15 years, resting at around a third of the global population today. Crisis in nations like Turkey and the power of figures like Putin and Xi Jinping represents the declining standards of democracy across the globe. To ignore this very real threat to democracy is an insult to the lessons of the Berlin Wall.

Perhaps Westerners are far more likely to accept the permanence of democracy because dictatorship no longer sits on our doorstep as it did in 1989. When the EU dramatically expanded at the turn of the century to incorporate the states of Eastern Europe into the ‘Western bloc’, the distance between the UK and dictatorship extended dramatically, making it far easier to blissfully ignore. War-scarred Berlin became a party destination in the imagination of British students, whilst events outside of Europe pointing towards the continuing problem of dictatorship were swept under the rug. The same year the Berlin Wall fell the Chinese government massacred its people in Tiananmen Square and the Iranian government reissued fatwa. Not only did the fall of the Berlin Wall gives the UK rose-tinted glasses when viewing the fate of democracy, but it also encouraged a blindness to crises around the world.

Ultimately, the legacy of the Berlin Wall should be one of hope, a sign that one day the whole world might live under freedom and affluence. But it is also a warning: democracy is easily broken and takes revolutionary efforts to sustain. The democracy our grandparents fought for in World War II and the people of East Berlin fought for in 1989 is still yet to be achieved across the globe. Until we absorb the true meaning of 1989, 3.3 billion people may live in shackles for many years to come.