Wednesday, May 7, 2025
Blog Page 253

Go get that bread: Tips for navigating the job market

0

Applying for jobs can be daunting and stressful. Below you can find some bearings, ideas and starting points to help you to navigate this uncertain time. This list is by no means comprehensive, but it includes some useful tips stemming from my experience of applying for scientific jobs in academia and industry.

The golden rule: personalize your application  

It is tempting to prepare one CV and cover letter and spam it across all job applications. I get it, there are loads of jobs you want to apply to and writing a different cover letter for each one might seem like a complete waste of time. If you don’t really care about the job, just sending a generic cover letter and CV is understandable. But if you think you might be a good fit for the position and want to increase your chances, the way to make an employer notice you is to personalize both your cover letter and your CV.

How? Let’s begin with your cover letter. To start with, it’s okay  to have a generic introduction about your background, but make sure to not repeat line by line what you described in your CV. Instead, address one by one all the job specifications. Most jobs (especially academic) will have a list of essential and desirable job specifications. These can vary from very specific competences like “having a biochemistry degree” or “advanced experience with MATLAB” to very generic statements about “team-working” or “interpersonal abilities”. Make sure you address them all, even the more basic ones, ideally with real world examples. For instance, avoid saying “I am a great team-worker” (that doesn’t prove anything!), but list the aspect of your previous experience that helped you to develop such abilities. An example would be: “during that project I have worked in a team of 5 students and we were successful in… ”, or “during my internship I interacted with hospital patients daily, which was instrumental for developing my communicating skills.”

Now, the tricky part is being able to provide concrete examples without writing a very lengthy cover letter, so be as concise as possible. Usually, one page should be enough to convey the message without boring your future employer, even if I must admit my cover letters always end up being longer than that. After you have written a few cover letters you will find that similar specifications keep coming up, so you don’t actually have to rewrite the entire application from scratch.

At the end of your cover letter insert a paragraph – or at least a sentence – about the company you’re applying to. This is the chance to show off that you have researched the position and institution. Try avoiding generic statements and explain with as much originality as possible why you think this company would be a good fit for you and your future career, and what you could bring to their organisation.

Personalizing your CV might be less straightforward, but the general idea is to highlight the skills and experience that are relevant for the job at hand. This is particularly relevant if you are applying for multiple jobs. For example, if you’re applying to be a research assistant in a wet lab, it makes sense to highlight all your practical experience with molecular biology techniques, but a biomedical writing company will have less interest in knowing that you are great at performing PCR analysis. Make sure your CV reflects that.

Applying at the right time

I wanted to find a job as soon as possible (don’t we all?) and had loads of jobs I was keen on. However, by applying in a random order you might end up sending applications for positions that won’t open for months, and instead miss deadlines that are closing soon. Hence every time you find a job that could be of interest, it is important to check how long they are accepting applications for. There are usually two options:

  1. There is no mention of deadline, or there is a deadline but rolling applications are in place. This is the case for many industry jobs. The employers will check applications only until a suitable candidate is found, so don’t postpone applying!
  2. There is a set expiration date and no mention of how they will be checking applications. This is the case for most jobs in academia. In this case, I would save the ad in a list of  “positions to apply later” and prioritize applications to other jobs first. There is no benefit in applying sooner and you won’t hear back until after the expiry date anyways, so no rush in applying. 

Brief Interview tips

The application aims to show you meet all the requirements, but the goal is to get an interview. At the interview stage, you need to show that you are the best candidate and highlight what sets you apart from the rest.

Typical questions to keep in mind:

Why should they pick you over the other candidates? Tricky, I know. Spend some time thinking about this in advance!

Why do you want the job? Again, avoid generic answers. For example, you can think about specific features of the positions and how they match your interests and experience. This will also show that you did your homework and that you are familiar with the company.

Random situational questions that start with “Tell me about a time when…” (e.g. a time when you worked in a team, made a mistake, disagreed with your superior, had to overcome a challenge…). Think about some of these situations beforehand as it can be challenging to come up with an answer on the spot. Be as specific as possible and tell a story that is realistic but makes you look good overall. You can think about a few examples from a recent project you worked on and come up with a few answers around it. It’s useful to practice these with a friend!

Lastly, think about some questions you can ask the interviewers. Usually at the end of the interview they will ask you if you have any questions. This is your chance to figure out if the company is a good fit for you (hence you can ask legit questions you might have), but it can also be yet another opportunity to show off your knowledge of the company. Make sure you do not ask something that you could have found out by reading their website.

Apply, apply, apply!

Don’t be afraid of rejection. You will be rejected many times, sometimes even for that one job that you really wanted. But that’s okay, because applications and interviews are a great experience, and after every interview you will be a bit more prepared than before. Also, don’t be scared to shoot high. You want this very ambitious job but you fear you might not be good enough? Let the employers decide, don’t make the decision for them. When doubting if you are qualified or not just apply anyway!

Bird Flu case confirmed in Oxford

0

It has been confirmed this week that an Oxford swan had bird flu.

A member of Swan Support, a charity helping sick and injured swans in the Thames Valley area, confirmed that the case was related to a swan at Iffley Lock.

There have been a number of suspected cases of avian flu after several birds, including three swans and a number of geese, were found dead in Port Meadow.

Swan Support added that the case of the dead birds at Port Meadow is still being investigated by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

This comes as Oxfordshire County Council has released advice to those living in the local area, warning them to keep away from wild birds and to avoid touching them. The council added that people should keep to footpaths, keep dogs on a lead, not feed wild waterfowl and not touch or pick up dead or sick wild birds.

A spokesperson for Oxfordshire County Council said: “People can also spread the disease on their clothes and shoes”.

Whilst some strains of bird flu can pass to humans, the UK Health Security Agency states that this is extremely rare and usually requires very close contact with the infected bird, therefore concluding that the risk of transmission to humans is a low.

Image: Robert Woeger

Puzzles Solutions HT22 Week 3

0
Medium Sudoku Solutions
Hard Sudoku Solutions
Micro Cryptic Crossword Solutions
Pencil Puzzle Solutions

New era of porn not welcome, says Union

CW: Sexual violence, rape

The Oxford Union voted against welcoming the new era of porn. The motion failed with 139 votes in favour and 171 votes against. 

The debate attracted a full house and a loud round of applause as the speakers entered the chamber, particularly for ex Love Island contestant Megan Barton-Hanson. 

The night’s proposition consisted of Liberty Osborne, a first year oriental studies student and guest liaison officer, Cindy Gallop, advertising consultant and the founder of MakeLoveNotPorn and IfWeRanTheWorld, and Megan Barton-Hanson, a former contestant on the hit reality TV show Love Island and advocate for body positivity and the end of patriarchal double standards surrounding sex. 

The opposition consisted of Matthew Dick, a first year History Student and member of the secretary’s Committee, Louise Perry, a UK based writer and campaigner whose works deal extensively with the modern feminist movement and society’s outlook on sex, and Sharon Chau, a second year PPE student and Chair of Consultative Committee. 

The debate kicked off with Union President Molly Mantle welcoming the first speaker, University College’s Liberty Osborne, to the floor. 

Osborne opened the proposition by condemning companies like MindGeek:  “Forget about big pharma, big tech: big porn’s what you lot should worry about.” She explained that in a world where porn does exist, the creation of platforms like OnlyFans provides an opportunity for pornstars to be in control of their own content. Liberty argued that the porn produced by this new era has “empowered porn performers”, since in the old era they were “paid for the day, then sent away”. 

Above all, Liberty argued that the new era of porn is creating ‘better’ porn: porn which is “more intimate, more personal, less scripted, less edited – porn which is far more like people’s actual experience of sex”. In other words, the return of reality to porn could change how people understand sex – in a world where most sex education “sucks”, the presentation of realistic sex should allow people to understand the process of sex in real life. 

Matthew Dick, whose name sparked laughter from the chamber, then took the floor for the opposition, stating: “The proposition and opposition are not debating the merits or evils of the porn industry…. The opposition believes that the new form of porn is still fundamentally exploitative… we are opposing the new era of porn, not a new era of porn.”

As he introduced the opposition member Megan Barton Hanson, Matthew Dick described how making a cheap joke about Love Islanders exaggerating themselves on social media, pulling people for a chat to make alliances, and pretending to be friends with someone for personal gain, hit a bit too close to home as an elected member of the Union. 

“The simple fact is that OnlyFans like other platforms… cannot offer content creators financial protection.” The proposition claims that the new era of porn will benefit small creators financially, but Dick argues that this does not align with the reality of the situation.

In his closing statement, Dick argued that the problems with the old era of porn have not been eradicated as we enter the new: “This blurring of the real and the fantasy makes the new era of porn as likely if not more so to influence users’ own sexual relations in a way that is detrimental to themselves and their partner,” as in mainstream pornography. He highlighted the exploitative aspects of pornography surrounding the financial freedoms of creators and the sexual actions of minors as reasons to vote against the new era of porn.

Matthew was followed by Cindy Gallop, whom he introduced as having inspired him in an interview where she removed an item of clothing for every question she answered, all the while removing his own coat jacket. 

Cindy Gallop’s platform, MakeLoveNotPorn, attracted attention following her notorious TEDTalk, where she “became the only TED speaker to say the words ‘cum on my face’ on the TED stage, six times in succession.” 

Gallop immediately addressed the chamber: “You …  are directly responsible for the new era of porn. We all watch porn. We don’t talk about it. Porn therefore exists in a parallel universe, a shadowy underworld… the landscape of porn needs curation, navigation, and celebration.”

Gallop summarised the arguments of the proposition as “pro sex, pro porn, pro knowing the difference”. Her open and honest discussion of her own sex life, in the debate as in her career and personal life, enabled her to highlight the conflict between the porn world and the real world and the possibility of aligning them. She described her platform, MakeLoveNotPorn, as “what Facebook would be if it allowed people to sexually self-express”, and accredited ‘new era’ porn sites with making safe-consensual sex “aspirational”. 

Gallop repurposed a quote from Wayne LaPierre, leader of the National Rifle Association’s National School Shield Emergency Response Program, saying in her own words that “the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a business is a good guy with a better business.”

Cindy Gallop wrapped up by advocating for the students of Oxford to become MakeLoveNotPorn creators themselves: “Video yourself shagging on the steps of the Bodleian. Represent and show the world what Oxford is capable of.”

Next up, in opposition, Louise Perry warned: “most pornstars enter the porn industry in their late teens and leave it in their thirties. Suicide rates are incredibly high… in an industry that has a way of destroying the people that work for it.”

She argued that the proposition’s argument was fundamentally flawed, since “no one cares about feminist porn. No one watches feminist porn… the market has told us what it wants and it doesnt look very feminist at all.”

Perry spoke at length of the dangers and regrets porn performers experience, both during but especially after their career, highlighting the story of Linda Lovelace, one of the most famous pornstars of her age, and former proponent of the industry. Her most famous video was a movie called ‘Deep Throat’. Perry said, “It was only years later that she said she was coerced into the industry. Everyone who watched Deap Throat was watching her getting raped.” 

She also said that the idea of consent in porn is not good enough, and is only the bare legal requirement: “Not everyone is an adult, not everyone is consenting… taking a woman at her word when she says ‘of course I’m consenting’ is appealing because it’s easy.”

In stark contrast to Cindy Gallop’s closing statement, Louise Perry implored Oxford students to turn their backs on PornHub: “it is so much easier to give up porn than it is to give up factory farmed meat… not a single person in this room ever needs to watch porn ever again”. She likened porn to the McDonalds of sex, and asserted that we can all do without it: “We talk as if access to porn is a fundamental human right. 20 years ago there was no internet porn.”

Megan Barton-Hanson then took the floor amidst rampant applause. She joked that having been invited to join a room full of university students, “It’s refreshing to be here tonight and not have to take my clothes off,” but added, “if this speech doesn’t go well, I haven’t ruled it out.”

Megan spoke about her own experiences in the porn industry, and the benefits that the changing content can bring: “the biggest problem is how sex is viewed, with open disgust and shame… as a sex worker myself I always carried shame… I am an academic myself, but I chose to do it because I felt empowered as a woman.”

She said that watching porn made by women producing porn by themselves is a healthier way of viewing porn, and is a welcome change from the typical experience of teens trying to learn about sex by watching outdated porn. Now, with the media becoming more ‘open-minded’ on the topic of porn, Megan shared “Sex workers feel more in control and respected. We’re all becoming a bit more open.”

Megan concluded by announcing her goal to become a more “empowered, confident, safe sex worker” amidst the new era of porn. 

Megan was followed by Sharon Chau, who discussed the misconceptions about the autonomy and power that OnlyFans is perceived to provide and the reality of these sites. She shared her personal experience of the sexualisation and alienation of women caused by boys at her school who had grown up with access to porn: “using porn is harmful to women and everyone in the world.”

Chau said that the freedom to produce whatever content OnlyFans creators want is an illusion: “the harsh reality is they get sucked into this and they have to tailor themselves to people who ask for increasingly explicit things. This is crucially harmful because OnlyFans is a paid subscription service.” 

She asked the question, why would anyone pay so much for an OnlyFans subscription when porn is readily available for free? Answering, “because they can get content that is curated to their own taste… the buyer is always right, they have the right to demand anything they want from the creator… This is a far cry from the empowerment we’ve heard from the proposition.”

Chau argued that, in any world including porn, teenage kids who are interested in sex, and google it, first find “step sister stuck in washing machine.” Therefore, the risks of porn ending up on the dark web do not outweigh the benefits from removing porn from mainstream sites. 

On the topic raised by Megan on porn made by women for women, Chau made the point that “a lot of people who watch this porn are feminists themselves. You don’t get misogynistic men going onto specific porn sites that produce feminist porn. You still get them watching a lot of mainstream porn. So a lot of these problems are not ameliorated even with this new era.”

Image: Tom Morris/CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

BREAKING: Michael-Akolade Ayodeji elected SU President 2022-23

Michael-Akolade Ayodeji has been elected as the President of the Oxford Student Union for the 2022-23 academic year. 

3704 people turned out to cast 29049 votes, a 32% increase over the last election for president, where 2506 voted. A plurality of voters came from Jesus College, whose JCR won £300 in pizza vouchers. 

The leadership contest also had relatively low numbers of candidates standing, with only five students running for the spot, compared with eleven last year. 

In the Cherwell Town Hall profile published on Monday, we described him as “no ordinary student”. He told Cherwell: “‘I live for being busy. That’s why I do photography, American football, the SU, the Union. I have to do things’.”

In his manifesto, Michael stated he is committed to combating SU apathy, working on holistic access and improving the student experience. He said that he aimed “to ensure that there are not just opportunities but also sufficient support for people from all walks of life to excel”. He also stated: “I am not afraid to speak up when necessary.”

Michael’s experience includes President Elect for the Oxford Union for Trinity term 2022, former Member of the West Midlands YCA, former JCR DisRep, Access & Equal Opportunities Officer, and member of Class Act and Disability Campaigns. 

Speaking after the results were announced, Michael said he was “incredibly honoured and privileged” to be elected SU President and described the campaign process as a “valuable learning experience”. 

Other students elected to positions include:

Vice President Access and Academic Affairs: Jade Calder

Vice President Charities and Community: Anna-Tima Jashapara

Vice President Graduates: Shreya Dua

Vice President Welfare and Equal Opportunities: Grace Olusola

Vice President Women: Ellie Greaves

Student Trustees: Uri Sharell, Serene Singh, and Daniele Cotton.

NUS Delegates: Aditi Premkumar, Anas Dayeh, Ciaron Tobin, Alexander Nowak, Sarah Akintunde, Mundhar Ba-Shammakh, and Serene Singh.

Oxford Pride and Oxford Poverty Action Trust have been voted as the SU’s local Raise and Give (RAG) charity, with Amnesty International and Donate for Refugees being voted RAG international charities.

Image Credit: Cyril Malik

Ethiopia sees ‘staggering increase in food insecurity,’ Oxford study warns

0

Ethiopia’s food insecurity crisis is rapidly worsening to alarming extents under severe drought and civil conflict, shows Oxford’s Young Lives study, which has tracked the effects of poverty on 12,000 young people in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam over 20 years. 

41.7% of young people in Ethiopia surveyed reported their households running out of food in 2021, compared to 26.2% in 2020. 75.3% have been worried about running out of food in 2021, an almost 100% increase compared to 38.3% in 2020. One in three of those surveyed said they or their family went to sleep hungry. 

The findings emerge from Young Lives’ latest December 2021 survey involving 326 young people in Ethiopia’s southern regional state of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People’s Region (SNNPR). Households in the region comprise 9.9 people on average, indicating that the survey results are potentially applicable to around 3,227 people. 

These alarming figures represent a staggering increase in food insecurity compared to when we contacted the same families at the end of 2020, before the drought set in,’ says Dr Catherine Porter, Director of Young Lives, who says civil conflict and COVID-19 have also exacerbated the hunger crisis.  Around 5.7 million people in Ethiopia affected by the ‘devastating’ drought currently require food assistance, and 6.8 million are projected to need urgent humanitarian assistance by mid-March. The lowland regional states of Afar, Oromia, SNNPR, and Somali, spanning south, southeastern, and northeastern Ethiopia, have felt the blow of the drought most keenly, while in northern Ethiopia, Tigray, Afar, and Amhara have also been ravaged by civil conflict. 

Map of Regions of Ethiopia. Source: Jfblanc, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Ethiopia, Kenya, and Somalia are the three countries most impacted by the drought in the Horn of Africa. The East African peninsula is facing the driest conditions recorded in 40 years, caused by three consecutive failed rainy seasons, resulting in 13 million people facing severe hunger, said the UN on 8th February. 

In Ethiopia, the drought has led to mass crop failure and livestock deaths. Inflation rates and food costs have consequently skyrocketed, leading to increased displacement and soaring malnutrition rates. 

37% of children in Ethiopia under 5 are prone to acute malnutrition, according to Gianfranco Rotigliano, UNICEF Representative in Ethiopia. On a longer timescale, the ‘potential negative long-term impacts of severe malnutrition on children’s growing bodies and minds’ is a cause for deep concern, says Dr Alula Pankhurst, Young Lives Country Director in Ethiopia. 

Should the upcoming rainy season in March and April 2022 fail again, increased food insecurity and even famine could befall the country, warns UNICEF. 

In Ethiopia’s northernmost Tigray Region and neighbouring Afar and Amhara, food insecurity has also been triggered by the Tigray War, which has rocked the region with civil conflict between Ethiopian federal forces & Tigrayan forces since November 2020. All sides involved have since committed human rights violations including attacks on civilians, sexual violence, and targeting of ethnic minorities. 

Both UN Emergency Relief Chief Martin Griffths and Ethiopian WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have described the Ethiopian government’s withholding of food, medicine, and fuel from Tigray as a ‘blockade’. Yet Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed denied the existence of hunger in Tigray in June 2021, even as the UN and international aid groups announced around the same time that famine was hitting 300,000 in the region. 

The UN World Food Programme (WFP) estimated in January that 83% of people in Tigray were hungry, and 2 million, or almost 40%, of Tigrayans were suffering from ‘an extreme lack of food’. Across Tigray, Afar, and Amhara, a record-high 9 million people are in need of humanitarian food assistance. 

The conflict has also seen government-imposed bank shutdowns, store closures, and communication blackouts. For the Young Lives survey, researchers were unable to contact participants in Tigray and areas of Amhara due to communication hurdles. 

International agencies are making urgent appeals for funding in a race against the exacerbating hunger crisis in Ethiopia. The WFP has launched a Regional Drought Response Plan for the Horn of Africa that calls for US$327 million in donations as it risks running out of funds and supplies in Ethiopia. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) requested US$130 million in January for its Horn of Africa Drought Response Plan. UNICEF is appealing for US$31.8 million for its Ethiopia Emergency Drought Appeal. 

Young Lives expects to deliver full findings on food security and its impacts on the education, employment and mental health of young people in March 2022. Based at Oxford’s Department of International Development, the international, longitudinal study of childhood poverty tracks the changing effects of poverty on 12,000 young people in Ethiopia, India, Peru, Vietnam, with 3,000 of them in Ethiopia. Its team provides research and evidence for national policy and programme makers to effect change. 

Originally launched at the start of the millennium and planned to last 15 years, in line with the timeframe of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals, the study is now entering its 20th year. Noted for its duration, diversity of contexts covered, high retention rates, and innovative research methods, Young Lives has provided insight into the complex interrelations between health, education, and poverty in the countries studied. 

Image: Torsten Martens

What’s happening in the chapel: The best chapels and churches in Oxford

There are churches and chapels of some description on nearly every street in Oxford, so it can be difficult to know which ones you might like to visit. If you are going to worship, there is of course the question of denominations, along with the practicalities of the times of the services. If you are going for a look around, what sort of thing are you looking for? Do you like modern architecture, or – in my case – something with a bit more history? I thought it might be a good idea to share some of my recommendations with you, so you can go and explore for yourself. I have decided not to rank these (don’t worry, Lincoln will always be at the top) because there are many chapels I still haven’t visited! The churches on this list will be a mixture of university/college affiliated churches and churches that are open to the general public (although, as you will see, there is a good deal of overlap), and they should be fairly easy to access, either through asking around at colleges or just turning up and visiting!

Lincoln College Chapel

It would be a crime for me to write about the chapels and churches and not include my own college! It could be argued that Lincoln has two chapel buildings, with the library once being All Saints Church (one of the dreaming spires!), and if you have a look through the railings around the library you can still see some gravestones from the churchyard. The ‘modern’ chapel was consecrated in 1631 and for fans of stained glass, we have gorgeous windows, but I will leave it to you to work out what all of the scenes correspond to (personal favourite is a very odd looking whale). The chapel roof and floor have also been recently restored, so the chapel is looking at its best at the moment, but to get the full experience of the gilding on the ceiling I would recommend coming to an evensong and seeing the candlelight reflecting off all the gold and stained glass.

University Church of St Mary the Virgin

Popular with school trips and coach tours, University church is arguably the best whistle stop tour of the history of Christianity and the University in Oxford. Everyone from John Wesley to John Henry Newman have preached at University Church and it still maintains the tradition of notable visiting preachers. University church was also the site of the trial of the Oxford Martyrs, with a memorial erected to them near the memorial to John Radcliffe, but to discover more about the history of the church and the role it plays in the university it is best to have a quick visit. Whilst you are there, you can go up the 13th century tower and have excellent views of the city (excellent photo opportunity), then have a cup of tea or some lunch in The Vaults. University Church is a lovely place to sit and reflect after a long day in the Bodleian, or during a sightseeing trip!

Oxford Oratory Church of St Aloysius Gonzaga

This is probably better known as the Catholic Oratory, and it has a fascinating history that I neither have the skill or the wordcount to go into, but the reason why it’s on my list is the beautiful art and icons. Before I came to Oxford, I had never been inside a Catholic church, so I was rather taken aback by the grandeur and the different chapels. Luckily, there was someone friendly in the gift shop who happily explained some of the important elements to me. I would really recommend going for a look around and in particular trying to spot the saints on the sanctuary (which is behind the altar). I remember finding St John Chrysostom after wandering in from a tutorial at John’s, which struck me as my tutorial was focused rather heavily on him. But, if saints aren’t your cup of tea, I would also recommend having a look at some of the lovely patterns on the ceilings, or just sitting at a pew and taking in the atmosphere.

Wadham College chapel

Ok, I admit it, I did sneak in here after a tutorial. It is worth a visit, with gorgeous stained glass (you may have noticed a theme, I love a bit of stained glass). I’m sure it’s lovely during a service, but I haven’t yet persuaded a Wadhamite to accompany me so I can visit in a more auspicious manner, rather than sticking my head round the door and creeping in and out.

St Mary the Virgin, Iffley

This admittedly is neither in central Oxford, nor is it in any way affiliated with the university. However, it is a beautiful Romanesque church and it would be a shame to leave it off this list, as it is one of my favourites. The journey would be manageable by bike or bus on the main road, but you can also walk to Iffley along the canal, and there is a pub and a small shop in the village if you fancy a snack. There is something lovely about walking from the main road, with all the noise of the traffic and into a peaceful churchyard. The physical distance from Oxford itself, probably plays a part in this, as it feels like a little holiday to be away from libraries, lectures and classes, just for a short few hours. The inside of the chapel is incredibly calming, with simple, modern decoration. I would recommend a visit to this church after a long walk, then followed by a nice warm meal, with no thought given to impending deadlines or essays.

This is certainly not an exhaustive list of my favourite chapels and churches, but these are a few that I would like to share with you. I do hope you visit them (everyone is welcome at Lincoln College Chapel), not just to worship or appreciate the architecture, but to find some stillness in what can be such a hectic town.

Image Credit: David Iliff, CC BY-SA 3.0

Table 13 Review: An eye-opener to what vegetables can do

0

What Georgia Gallacher has accomplished with her first foray into the restaurant industry is truly extraordinary.  Table 13 manages to capitalise on recent booming trends of plant-based eating, a focus on food provenance, and supper clubs whilst not falling into the trap of becoming a gimmick. The focus here is on the quality of the final product and each of the nine dishes we try are stunning, brilliantly thought-out creations.  The atmosphere that she creates through hosting in her own kitchen is unique and her willingness to chat with diners throughout makes for a culinary experience to treasure.

I was lucky enough to visit Georgia in Wheatley with a friend on a Wednesday night, a special experience as  she usually only opens on Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays.  As we were the only two diners, we were really able to talk in detail with the young chef about the ethos behind the restaurant, how it got started, how she got started, and above all the food itself. This is why the supper club model works so well, especially when the host is as personable as Georgia:  even when fully booked there are only ever ten guests at a time.  Everybody sits at one long table and receives the dishes at the same time – Georgia was keen to highlight that this aspect of the meal was something she held dear.  She pointed out that there is something special about coming somewhere to eat where everyone has a shared interest in their food and is excited for the culinary experience to follow.  Not only is she warm and welcoming but highly professional. Having studied in hospitality and worked in front of house roles in Australia as well as several famous restaurants across London she effortlessly puts guests at ease.

Her passion is clear to see from minute one. Through each of the nine dishes there is a focus on using seasonal local produce from local producers and merchants, elevating plant-based eating beyond dishes that are vegan just for the sake of it.  Here, vegetables come into their own in ways that are hard to imagine.  Her ‘seed-to-stalk’ approach, (coined by Gallacher herself and a play on the ‘nose-to-tail’ eating popularised by St John) is about using every part of a vegetable, even those that might usually be thrown away.  Take the cauliflower dish for example: not only do you savour the main slice itself, pan-roasted in butter with garlic and thyme, but the florets are removed, roasted, and pureed to produce a stunning reduction with the leaves added as a garnish atop the Brazil nut crumble.  The fact that the menu changes every month means that Georgia is constantly thinking about the development of new dishes and as a result – no stone is left unturned at Table 13.

Not even the drinks pairing escapes this special treatment.  Working with local Oxford company L’Altre Vi, all wines are produced using low-intervention and sustainable methods in Catalonia and expertly paired with the plates they accompany.  The Oxford Artisan Distillery provides spirits and the whisky for the butter that accompanies the bread course.  

That bread course merits special mention.  The only constant on the ever-changing menu, her soda bread uses stout from a local brewer as well as honey and oats from Wesse Mill.  It was paired with a homemade whisky butter and stout reduction from that very same brewer.  Georgia is working her way around different breweries every month and as you might have guessed they are all local and all focussed on sustainable processes.

Table 13 isn’t just about lofty ideals though.  What stands out most is the food.  Time and time again, Gallacher produced dishes that were genius in their creation.  Evidently carefully planned out and developed, the use of contrasting textures and flavours surprised and delighted throughout the evening.  The first of our dessert courses is a perfect example: a Jerusalem Artichoke ice cream which was stunningly cool and smooth.  It was served atop a bitter cocoa crumble that contrasted with garnishing kumquats and Jerusalem artichoke chips to create a party in our mouths.  Sustainability and veganism are an added bonus here.  As Georgia says herself, “Table 13 is about surprising people, not lecturing them. To me, food is so much more than just sustenance – it is a source of enjoyment, creativity, fun and friendship.  This trumps all.”

Going forward, Georgia eventually plans for a restaurant beyond her old family home.  For now though she is focused on delivering this stunning and unique experience from her kitchen.  In the summer there are plans for an extra table outside, taking capacity to 20 covers each evening.  Regardless of the expansions, however, she wants to preserve the intimate feel and to continue to serve the same dishes, at the same time, with the same care dedicated to each and every guest.

So, give Table 13 a try.  At £70 for all nine courses and the drinks pairing, you are unlikely to find a better value tasting menu anywhere.  You might just have your eyes opened to what vegetables can do and what, with care and skill, they can become on a plate.  Whatever happens, I can promise that you will have an exceptionally enjoyable evening in the hands of a young chef who will surely go on to shine in the industry.

South Asian upbringing: Laila-Majnu

0

What Lord Byron called ‘the Romeo and Juliet of the East’ has passed through the Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Indian languages. The story of Laila-Majnu, of Old Arabic origin, was written by Qays ibn al-Mulawwah in the 7th century about his love Layla bint Mahdi. 

The poem became popularised as a praise of soul-binding love and permeates literature of the cultures it has touched. In the South Asian subcontinent, the story of Laila Majnu is widely used in modern art and literature to refer to the tragedy and intense love of the ‘star-crossed lovers’ (to compound Byron’s orientalism) and express the idea that two lovers have been created for one another.

The autobiographical anecdotes from al-Mulawwah himself are short and very loosely interconnected, but poets such as Nizami and Amir Khusrow have extended on them to create love poems that stand as original literary works in their own right.

Today, I’ll tell you the story as I know it, as it has permeated through the South Asian culture and has come to stand as its own confession of love, separate from its literature.

We don’t know where and we don’t know when, but we do know that there were two tribes whose children shared a school. There was, at this school, a Qais, from whose mouth fell pearls when he spoke and a Laila, who was bright as the morning with eyes dark as a stag’s. 

They shared one single glance that sent their hearts ablaze and muddled their every thought and Qais was determined to woo her. Each time they gazed on one another; Love’s flaming taper blazed more intensely. 

So immersed in love, the whole world watched as their hearts became one. Till Qais became sick with the passion of his love, watching the ringlets of her curls and her dark eyes flashing quick and bright, he gazed and gazed and found no rest for Laila was forever in his sight.

Till one day he sought her in her home, climbing the ivy on the wall and crying ‘Laila! Laila!’. Dejected and forlorn he finds his love is gone but her scent still scintillates. He laid prostrate in his grief and whispers in vow, 

“Your form never quits my sight,

Fetters my thoughts by day and my dreams by night;

Could it be that

The Evil eye has lifted and struck my heart? 

It’ll be your beauty that sped the dart.”

As the morning sun rose, Qais became Majnun, maddened by his love for his Laila. 

He rose with his eyes all tears and his soul aflame and never stopped repeating his Laila’s name in all his wanderings. 

Faint and reckless as he was, he passed through the desert in search of his Laila, for Majnun’s love was not of this earth, nor could this earth hold it.

He searched and searched as his heart was consumed with grief and was sighted by Laila’s tribe, who reported back to her chieftain father that there was a madman amongst the sands chanting her name with his loose hair and outstretched arms, and that he often either dances in love-daze or prostrates on the ground, warbling the melting songs of their love. 

Laila’s blush sealed his death warrant. They ventured the desert, seeking to soak it with his blood and Laila was wrung with groans and tears. Across the desert span, each breathed a prayer for the other and the sands sighed in mournful strain as Majnun moves towards home.

Laila was hastily married off to a rich and noble merchant, a handsome man with a rose complexion and Majnun was hunted for many days and nights until it was decided to leave him to the talons of the desert that he had condemned himself to.

But, even on the night of her wedding, Laila heard of her lover’s constant woes, as his poetry and songs of her pervaded the lands to reach her walls.

She pines alone, consumed in deep despair. She sheds no tears until the fatal passion invades and the agony sears. 

And if you must know, then know that, cursing the poison of Love, she claims that her prayers for Majnun themselves were written with the pen of Love. She claims that f they should be the dark shame of night, then the lovers’ Resurrection will come with the rising sun. 

She begs her mother for her Qais:

‘All I desire

Laid on my pyre, pillowed in my grave,

Is that anguish-tormented youth, who

With his ambrose words of truth,

Blended our souls into one;

That he may come 

And I may feel his first touch

In the tears he weeps upon his Laila’s tomb.’

And Laila’s mother watched her beauty settle into the trance of demise, watched as she dissolved like salt into tears, how she fell into a spell of shivers, prostrate on the sands and never, never, never rose again. 

All the skies wept for their fate and weeping Majnun’s friends washed his white bones and with ceaseless tears performed the final funeral rite, laying him mournfully by his Laila’s side. 

And gently, in that cold, dark earth, one grave hides their corpses, that death was no divorce of this one promise that bound their hearts. In final safety, their souls from their graves moved as one. 

Source: Niẓāmī Ganjavī (1141-1202), trans. Atkinson, James (1780-1852), ed. Atkinson, James Augustus (1832?-1911), Loves of Lailí and Majnún : A Poem from the Original Persian of Nizámi. London: David Nutt, 1894. Presented to Oxford Bodleian Indian Institute November 1894.

Image Credit: Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0

Concerns raised over Oxford researchers linked to Chinese military

0

A Times investigation has revealed that collaborations between British scientists and institutes with deep connections to China’s defence forces have tripled in six years.

326 Oxford academics have collaborated with professors from Chinese military universities, known as the “Seven Sons of National Defence,” since 2015. Graduates from these universities were banned from entering the United States in 2020, as part of American efforts to curb suspected Chinese theft of intellectual property and technology. Oxford University has also accepted more than £24 million from Chinese sources since 2015, the third highest in the UK.

This picture is replicated across the Russell Group. Imperial College London and the University of Cambridge have accepted a combined £100 million from Chinese sources since 2015. Researchers from across the prestigious association’s component universities have also collaborated with Chinese military academics on 1,069 papers in 2021. Many of these papers were on sensitive “dual-use” research, involving technology that can be used for military aims as well as civilian purposes. This included: drones, electromagnetic technology capable of firing projectiles, cutting edge aerospace materials, radar, jamming equipment and high-performance batteries.

Often, the military applications of this dual-use research are barely disguised. Terence Langdon, of the University of Southampton, has co-authored 18 papers on materials science with a Chinese warhead designer. His Chinese co-author’s research specialism is to develop new materials technologies in ammunition, warheads, “damage mechanisms and endpoint effects,” and nanomaterials. Meanwhile, Imperial College London accepted £5 million to fund research into aerospace materials from three companies linked to the Chinese military. Two of those companies are subsidiaries of the defence contractor that manufactures China’s fighter aircraft. All are under U.S sanctions.

It is against this backdrop that British security officials have begun to voice their concerns.

Whitehall sources speaking to the Times warned that Britain was in an “arms race” with China and must protect cutting-edge technology that would give a military advantage. Tom Tugendhat MP, chairman of the foreign affairs select committee, said that “some British academics have turned a blind eye to the implications of working on military technologies with China”. 

Echoing this sentiment, Martin Thorley, a Chinese international policy specialist, said: “The findings appear to demonstrate some sector-wide failings in terms of checks on donations and research partners. They also include some instances of co-operation on projects with clear military applications that suggest outright recklessness by the British institutions involved. For some British universities and their staff, there appears to be a genuine risk of contributing directly to the development of technology employed by the People’s Liberation Army.”

Considered most worrying is research focused on railgun technology. These cutting-edge weapons use electrical currents to generate magnetic fields capable of accelerating a projectile at high velocities. Both the Chinese and the US governments have been looking to develop the technology to equip naval vessels and aircraft carriers with weapons and devices that launch aircraft.

Professor Chris Gerada, of the University of Nottingham, has co-authored four papers with Chinese colleagues from one of the “Seven Sons of National Defence”. These papers detail the applications of compulsators, power-supply devices that are a key component of railguns. The university said the research was “wholly focused” on reducing carbon emissions in passenger aircraft, was fully peer-reviewed and published openly. However, the Chinese university profile for one of Gerada’s co-authors lists his research interests as “special motors” used in fields of national defence, as well as “flywheel energy storage technology and its military-civilian integration application”.

Government guidance recommends that universities carefully consider their collaborations, check whether their research has “national security implications” and establish whether their funding partners pose “ethical or security concerns”. The guidance, aimed at preventing unwitting academics being lured in by hostile states, was compiled by the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI), a wing of MI5. It warns that joint research can be “vulnerable to misuse”, urging them to check whether their research could benefit the military of hostile states and to consider the reputational risks of collaborations. It highlights the issue of dual-use research, where technology can be developed for civilian aims but redeployed in the military. 

Despite the warnings, British academics are increasingly working closely with Chinese colleagues who make no secret of their military research aims. A Times source alleged that “the government seems to be more bothered about placating universities than actually dealing with the fact that many of them are teaching the Chinese military how to build super weapons.” 

A Russell Group spokesman said: “Research-intensive universities treat issues of national security extremely seriously, undertaking robust due diligence checks in line with government guidance.”

A government spokesman said that international research collaboration was “central to our position as a science superpower” but added: “We will not accept collaborations which compromise our national security and the government continues to support the sector to identify and mitigate the risks of interference.”

The University of Oxford has been approached for comment.

Image: Gadiel Lazcano